Dr. Pop


Dr. Pop Blog

A Clear View of Public Housing

7/15/2011 by Gilda Haas - 2 comments

Related stories:  Privatizing Public Housing, UK and Estate, a book review


 

This cartoon was created by Dr. Pop and the  Campaign to Restore National Housing Rights (CRNHR), a national organizing effort led by grassroots groups from the across the country who are fighting for a human right to housing in the United States. We also got great critical feedback and help from public housing members of the Los Angeles Community Action Network (LA CAN) and Union de Vecinos in Los Angeles and Community Voices Heard (CVH) and the Red Hook Initiative in New York City.

 

A Clear View of Public Housing is a story about public housing in the United States.  It takes place on a sunny day when three women of different economic classes meet up at a city park along with their young children and then get into a conversation about public housing.

 

A Clear View of Public Housing was made to be used as a  springboard to conversations and actions led by communities organizing in defense of human rights and, in particular, the human right to housing.

 

The story will be  available in three forms:

The above Video which you can share by email, post to your  website, or download.  A Spanish Version is also available.

 

An Interactive Slideshow version of the video, for use in workshop settings, as suggested below. [request]

 

A Comic Book (coming soon) for door-to-door outreach or to hand out after a workshop

Tips for Facilitators


Here are three simple ways that the Campaign to Restore National Housing Rights has used the story in workshop settings.

 

1.  Role-Play
Ask volunteers from your meeting or workshop to take on a character’s role and read their speech bubble aloud to the rest of the audience.  We found the results to be engaging and funny.

 

2.  Practice: “What Would You Say?”After watching the video or slideshow, break up into small groups or pairs to practice answering one or two questions that came up in the story, such as:

 

What would you say, if someone said this to you:
Housing is a business and the government should stay out of it.  They should leave business to the business people.

or
Public housing over-concentrates poor people into neighborhoods, and that is not good for anybody.

or
Subsidized housing takes away people’s incentive to work hard.  No one should get something for nothing.

 

The burden is often on public housing tenants and housing rights activists to re-educate legislators and the general public on the issues that we face.  This often means that we must engage in conversations that are full of myths and prejudices.  You can use A Clear View as a tool to practice our side of these conversations, share the results with each other, and build the confidence we need to confront hidden myths and prejudices.

 

3.  Make Your Own Story!
Before we created A Clear View, we took some time to break down the story that we are being told about public housing.  We found that that exercise gave us a window into the assumptions and vulnerabilities of that story, and helped us get better at building one that reflects our own reality.  To do this, we used the Narrative Power Analysis tool which you can find in smartMeme‘s really helpful book: Re-imagining Change.

 

For more information about the CRNHR and to send feedback, stories, and suggestions, visit restorehousingrights.org or contact Brittany Scott.  We would love to hear from you!

 

Tags: , ,

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Comments

  1. Hollis Stewart says:

    Gilda,

    I organized a lot of tenants in public housing and from my work in that area I like to point out something that many people do not know. Most Boards of Directors of Public Housing Agencies: City, County, … are from the private housing interests: real estate, banking, mortgage, politicians and other corporate elites whose interest is much different than folk living in public housing or in housing that is subsidized as public housing. It was no wonder that public housing became poverty ghettos, it was the best way for the private housing interests to discredit public housing so that “government” housing could become a horror story. The private housing interests had no interest in getting the poor out of slums because the private housing interests owned the slums. So, it was not in their economic interest to empty the slums. When public housing residents asked to have representatives on Housing Boards they were almost always told no. If they did get representation it was as a very small minority, perhaps one representative, who would have no way to control the votes and defeat the private housing interests.

  2. Gilda Haas says:

    True, that.
    When I worked at Legal Aid in the 80s we did a lot of work with public housing tenants as well.
    One of the shameful things about the Housing Authority at the time was that they would place the developments that had the most need of rehab as the lowest priority in their annual request to HUD, so that they would never get funded. That is how they anticipated a need to tear them down (by creating that need) if they didn’t fall down in the process.
    But the simple point here is that things do not have to be that way. Public housing can be managed responsibly (as can private housing). Homelessness can be prevented. People in our society can actually take care of their own. But only if we see each other as “our own.”

Leave a Comment